Xu Hướng 6/2023 # Shipping Vs. Delivery: What’s The Difference? # Top 12 View | Channuoithuy.edu.vn

Xu Hướng 6/2023 # Shipping Vs. Delivery: What’s The Difference? # Top 12 View

Bạn đang xem bài viết Shipping Vs. Delivery: What’s The Difference? được cập nhật mới nhất trên website Channuoithuy.edu.vn. Hy vọng những thông tin mà chúng tôi đã chia sẻ là hữu ích với bạn. Nếu nội dung hay, ý nghĩa bạn hãy chia sẻ với bạn bè của mình và luôn theo dõi, ủng hộ chúng tôi để cập nhật những thông tin mới nhất.

In the terms and conditions section on web sites that sell products, the terms “shipping” and “delivery” are often seen. Most customers assume the terms are interchangeable and synonymous; however, despite their similarities, there are important differences to recognize between the two. The terms have risen in popularity with the rise of e-commerce, and online shoppers assume they mean the same thing. Retailers and business owners should clearly make the differences known to customers to prevent complaints.

Customers who are excited about a short shipping timeline may be frustrated with your business if their items arrive weeks later. Making sure they understand the difference between shipping and delivery will go a long way. If you’re unsure of the specific differences, keep on reading.

What Is Shipping?

The term “shipment” or “shipping” refers to the packaging and dispatching of small items that can be sent using the local postal service. Often when shoppers place an order, there is a shipping timeline displayed. For example: “Dispatched within four business days.”

The shipping timeline represents the number of working days it will take the warehouse staff to dispatch the product from the company’s end and shipping charges may vary. It also refers to the date on which the shipment will leave the warehouse of the retailer or supplier.

What Is Delivery?

Delivery refers to the estimated date larger items are sent to the customer from the distribution centre. These items may include major appliances and furniture or products that require installation by personnel.

Delivery also refers to the date the package will arrive to the customer. Delivery charges may range depending on the distance required to get from the warehouse to the customer.

Comparison between Shipping and Delivery

To put it as simply as possible: shipping is the date the product will leave the supplier’s warehouse while delivery is the date the package will make it to the customer’s doorstep. The terms are often confusing for customers; however, you can avoid this by providing two dates: the shipping date and delivery date.

This way, customers will have a clearer understanding of what each term means and how long it will take for their product to arrive. Companies can make this process simpler by e-mailing shipping and delivery tracking information to the customer. The shipping date would let customers know the product has left the warehouse, and the delivery date would give them clarity as to when they should expect their order. Shipping was originally referred to as “dispatching” and delivery is still sometimes known as “distribution.” These previously-used terms give customers a better understanding of their meaning and the process involved.

Get Logistics and Warehouse Management Support with LSS

Lean Supply Solutions’ order fulfillment services in Toronto, ON, and Vancouver, BC, can help your warehouse management goals work better than ever before. Our third-party logistics, packaging, and supply chain management can streamline your processes for better success. We live by the Lean Methodology, a proven philosophy focused on eliminating any operations, equipment, or resources that are not capable of adding value to clients’ supply chains. By striving to ensure that the right products are provided to the right customers at the right time, Lean Supply Solutions is able to offer consistent, accurate, and quality results. To learn more about outsourcing to our 3PL distribution team, or to ask any questions, contact us at 905-482-2590.

Put Vs Patch (What’S The Difference?)


When learning web development and HTTP specification, it is not unlikely to find yourself getting confused about the type of verb to use, and when to use it. With most applications on the internet being CRUD (create, read/retrieve, updates, delete), developers must learn how to match HTTP verbs to these actions. Typically, the verbs and actions are matched as follows:

POST – Create

GET – Read/Retrieve

PUT/PATCH – Update

DELETE – Delete

From this mapping, it is not surprising that most people think that PUT and PATCH are allies that do the same thing. However, the reality is far more complex, especially when it comes to overlapping functionality and other complications. Actually, PUT and PATCH might be doing the same thing of updating a resource at a location, but they do it differently. Therefore, to understand more about these verbs, let’s dive deep into HTTP specification and identify the subtle differences between the two.

Browse the Best Free APIs List

What is PUT?

PUT is a method of modifying resource where the client sends data that updates the entire resource. It is used to set an entity’s information completely. PUT is similar to POST in that it can create resources, but it does so when there is a defined URI. PUT overwrites the entire entity if it already exists, and creates a new resource if it doesn’t exist.

For example, when you want to change the first name of a person in a database, you need to send the entire resource when making a PUT request.

{“first": "John", "last": "Stone”}

To make a PUT request, you need to send the two parameters; the first and the last name.

What is PATCH?

Unlike PUT, PATCH applies a partial update to the resource.

This means that you are only required to send the data that you want to update, and it won’t affect or change anything else. So if you want to update the first name on a database, you will only be required to send the first parameter; the first name.

Differentiating PUT and PATCH Using an Analogy of Land

Imagine we have empty a piece of land where we have the option to erect multiple houses. The land is divided into plots and houses will be built on each plot as designated by numbers. All we need it to do is to determine which house will be built where. When we translate the above information to REST, we will have the following: https://domain.com/house


Let say plot 1 has a house that has been equipped with all the amenities. Making a PUT request can lead to a number of outcomes. However, to stick to the topic, let’s consider the following request: https://domain.com/house/1 using this payload:

{ "front_patio": true, "back_patio": true, "windows": 12, "doors": 4, "Balcony": false }

Now that we have a house on plot 1, what will happen is that every property on the house will be replaced by the data in the payload. So, if our payload only had the following information:

{ "doors": 5 }

We will have a house that has doors property and nothing else since a PUT request overwrites everything.

What if we issue a PUT request on a resource that doesn’t exist. In this case let’s say on plot 3: https://domain.com/house/3. In this case, a new resource will be created. But it is crucial to note that, it is imperative to define the entire resource when making PUT requests or else it could yield undesired results.


PATCH is used when you want to apply a partial update to the resource. Let’s assume the house on plot 1 has the following features:

{ "front_patio": true, "back_patio": true, "windows": 12, "doors": 4, "Balcony": false }

And we want to make the following update:

{ "doors": 5 }

The result will be as follows:

{ "front_patio": true, "back_patio": true, "windows": 12, "doors": 5, "Balcony": false }

Additionally, we can also add a new feature that didn’t exist in the resource. For example, a garage and the result will be:

{ "front_patio": true, "back_patio": true, "windows": 12, "doors": 5, "Balcony": false, “garage”: true }

However, you should note that calling HTTP PATCH on a resource that doesn’t exist is bound to fail and no resource will be created.

A Summary of Differences/Similarities between PUT and PATCH

From the discussion above, we can clearly outline the similarities/ differences between these two methods.

Similarities between PUT and PATCH

The only similarity between the two is that they can both be used to update resources in a given location.

Differences between PUT and PATCH

The main difference between PUT and PATCH requests is witnessed in the way the server processes the enclosed entity to update the resource identified by the Request-URI. When making a PUT request, the enclosed entity is viewed as the modified version of the resource saved on the original server, and the client is requesting to replace it. However, with PATCH, the enclosed entity boasts a set of instructions that describe how a resource stored on the original server should be partially modified to create a new version.

The second difference is when it comes to idempotency. HTTP PUT is said to be idempotent since it always yields the same results every after making several requests. On the other hand, HTTP PATCH is basically said to be non-idempotent. However, it can be made to be idempotent based on where it is implemented.

Final Verdict

Now that you have a clear outlook of the similarities/differences between PUT and PATCH, you will probably make the best choice when designing a RESTful API or a new web application. Understanding these subtle differences will help improve your experience when integrating and creating cooperative apps.

Related Reading

Where to get Free APIs?

Get access to these top APIs for free only on RapidAPI.

Browse the Best Free APIs List








What’s The Difference Between A Uri And A Url?

The terms “URI” and “URL” are often used interchangeably, but they are not exactly the same.



is an identifier of a specific resource. Like a page, or book, or a document.



is special type of identifier that also tells you how to access it, such as HTTPs, FTP, etc.—like



If the protocol (https, ftp, etc.) is either present or implied for a domain, you should call it a


—even though it’s also a



All URLs are URIs, but not all URIs are URLs.

When most people talk about a given URI, they’re also talking about a URL because the protocol is implied.

That’s really it.

TL;DR: When communicating, being more specific is usually better, so “URL” is better than “URI” when talking about web addresses.

That’s all you probably need to know, but if you want to see how the sausage is made (I warn you, it’s gross), feel free to read on!

A deeper explanation (let’s get technical)

This is one of the most common Nerd Fight debates in tech history, and that’s saying a lot.

One obstacle to getting to the bottom of things is that the relevant RFCs are extremely dense, confusing, and even contradictory. For example, RFC 3986 says a URI can be a name, locator, or both…

My emphasis.

A URI can be further classified as a locator, a name, or both. The term “Uniform Resource Locator” (URL) refers to the subset of URIs that, in addition to identifying a resource, provide a means of locating the resource by describing its primary access mechanism (e.g., its network “location”).

RFC 3986, Section 1.1.3

But just a little further down that same RFC says…

My emphasis.

The URI itself only provides identification; access to the resource is neither guaranteed nor implied by the presence of a URI.

RFC 3986, Section 1.2.2

And then, if you’re not yet completely confused, it also says…

My emphasis.

Each URI begins with a scheme name, as defined in Section 3.1, that refers to a specification for assigning identifiers within that use the general term “URI” rather than the more restrictive terms “URL” and “URN”

RFC 3986, Section 1.1.3

So that’s support for the “URI” denomination, but in my opinion it’s even more support for those who say, “stop looking for the answers in 15-year-old RFCs”.

It’s like another widely-read text in this way.

There’s just so much contradictory content that there’s partial backing for multiple conclusions.


What a mess. Here’s the TL;DR…

The RFCs are ancient, poorly written, and not worth debating until they’re updated.

A URI is an identifier.

A URL is an identifier that tells you how to get to it.

Use the term that is best understood by the recipient.

I’d welcome a new version of the RFC that simplifies and clarifies the distinction, with modern examples.

These RFCs were written a very long time ago, and they’re written with the academic weakness of not being optimized for reading.

The best thing I can possibly tell you about this debate is not to over-index on it. I’ve not once in 20 years seen a situation where the confusion between URI or URL actually mattered.

The irony is that RFCs are supposed to remove confusion, not add to it.

So while there is some direct support that “URI” is preferred by the RFCs, and “URL” seems most accurate for full addresses with http(s) schemes (because it’s most specific), I’ve chosen to prioritize the Principle of Communication Clarity higher than that of pedantic nuance.

It’s taken me a long time to get to this point.

As a result, I personally use “URL” in most cases because it’s least likely to cause confusion, but if I hear someone use “URI” I’ll often switch immediately to using that instead.


May 3, 2023

— I’ve done a major update to the article, including correcting some errors I had had in previous versions. Namely, I had fragments such as file.html shown as a URN, which is not right. This version of the article is the best version, especially since it fully explores the conflicting language within the RFC and how little we should actually be paying attention to such an old document. I’d definitely read and follow an update, though.

RFC 3986 Link

The Wikipedia article on URI Link

Gitlab Vs Github: What Are The Key Differences? The Ultimate Guide

This article is brought to you by Usersnap. Usersnap helps you to communicate visually. And the best part? It connects with GitLab and GitHub. Get a 15-day free trial here.

Version Control repository management services are a key component in the software development workflow. In the last few years, GitHub and GitLab positioned themselves as handy assistants for developers, particularly when working in large teams.

With the latest release of GitLab 10.0, GitLab took a major leap forward from code management, to deployment and monitoring. GitLab calls it Complete DevOps. They aim for the entire software development, deployment, and DevOps market.

That means when talking about the differences and similarities of GitLab vs GitHub, we need to look beyond code repositories and take a look at the entire process.

Git explained

Both, GitLab and GitHub are web-based Git repositories.

What is a Git Repository?

The aim of Git is to manage software development projects and its files, as they are changing over time. Git stores this information in a data structure called a repository.

Such a git repository contains a set of commit objects and a set of references to commit objects.

A git repository is a central place where developers store, share, test and collaborate on web projects.

More than a Git repository: How to Complete DevOps

Nowadays, GitLab and GitHub are more than “just” git repositories for developers.

GitLab says about their recently announce Complete DevOps vision:

Now, we’re taking it a step further to unite development and operations in one user experience.

GitLab realized the need for better and deeper integrations between development and DevOps toolchains. With the latest release of 10.0, GitLab rethinks the scope of tooling for both developers and operation teams.

The Basics of GitHub and GitLab

Let’s start with the basics. GitHub is a Git-based repository hosting platform with 40 million users (January 2023) making it the largest source code globally. Originally, GitHub launched in 2008 and was founded by Tom Preston-Werner, Chris Wanstrath, and PJ Hyett.

GitHub projects can be made public and every publicly shared code is freely open to everyone. You can have private projects as well, but only 3 collaborators allowed on the free plan.

Public repositories on GitHub are often used to share open source software. Besides the basic code repository, GitHub can be used for issue tracking, documentation, and wikis.

Overall, more than 100 million repositories have been created on GitHub in 2023.

Similar to GitHub, GitLab is a repository manager which lets teams collaborate on code. Written in Ruby and Go, GitLab offers some similar features for issue tracking and project management as GitHub.

Founded by Dmitriy Zaporozhets and Valery Sizov in 2011, GitLab employs more than 1,300 people and according to Wikipedia, GitLab has 100,000 users (March 2023) and is used by enterprises such as IBM, Sony, and NASA.

Key differences and similarities: GitLab vs GitHub

According to various sources and our own experience, we identified the following key differences you should know when making the decision: GitLab vs GitHub.

Authentication Levels

With GitLab you can set and modify people’s permissions according to their role. In GitHub, you can decide if someone gets a read or write access to a repository.

With GitLab you can provide access to the issue tracker (for example) without giving permission to the source code. This is obviously great for larger teams and enterprises with role-based contributors.

GitLab CI vs GitHub Actions

One of the big differences between GitLab and GitHub is the built-in Continuous Integration/Delivery of GitLab. CI is a huge time saver for many development teams and a great way of QA (nobody likes pull requests that break your application).

GitLab offers its very own CI for free. No need to use an external CI service. And if you are already used to an external CI, you can obviously integrate with Jenkins, Codeship, and others.

GitLab has clearly been addressing the DevOps market earlier than its competitor as well as offering an operations dashboard that lets you understand the dependencies of your development and DevOps efforts.

GitLab CI offers Auto DevOps which automatically run CI/CD without a human being actually setting it up.

But, really, every project should be running some kind of CI. So, why don’t we just detect when you’ve pushed up a project; we’ll just build it, and we’ll go and test it, because we know how to do testing.Mark Pundsack, source: gitlab.com

So, how does CI / CD work inside the GitHub universe? GitHub released Actions in late 2023, which essentially allows you to write tasks that automate and custom the development workflow. It’s also free to get started.

But GitHub does not come with a deployment platform and needs additional applications, such as Heroku.

Download for free this step-by-step CI/CD pipeline set up guide with GitLab vs. GitHub & Travis CI.

Issue Tracking

GitLab, as well as GitHub, provide a simple issue tracker that lets you change status and assignee for multiple issues at the same time.

Both are great issue trackers, especially when connected with a visual bug tracker like Usersnap. While your developers still enjoy the great issue tracking interface of GitLab and GitHub, your testers, colleagues, and clients can simply report bugs through the Usersnap widget.

Bug reports and user feedback can automatically be sent to GitLab or GitHub. Or you can pre-filter those tickets inside Usersnap and manually send it to your development project.

Import & Export

When thinking about moving to GitLab or GitHub, you should also consider the setup costs and resources needed for getting started. In that regard, the topic of available import and export features is pretty important.

GitLab offers detailed documentation on how to import your data from other vendors – such as GitHub, Bitbucket – to GitLab.

GitHub, on the other hand, does not offer such detailed documentation for the most common git repositories. However, GitHub offers to use GitHub Importer if you have your source code in Subversion, Mercurial, TFS and others.

Also when it comes to exporting data, GitLab seems to do a pretty solid job, offering you the ability to export your projects including the following data:

Wiki and project repositories

The configuration including webhooks and services

GitHub, on the other hand, seems to be more restrictive when it comes to export features of existing GitHub repositories.


Both GitLab and GitHub offer a wide range of 3rd party integrations. Integrating your version control system with other application enriches your workflows and can boost productivity for your developers and your non-developers.

In order to check out if your favorite apps are compatible with GitLab and GitHub, I recommend checking out the documentation of GitLab and GitHub.

Besides the available integration partners, GitHub launched their GitHub marketplace in May 2023 offering you selected tools and applications.

GitLab took a similar path and offers multiple integrations for development and DevOps teams.

The GitHub community

GitHub positioned itself among its community of developers. And its popularity is mainly driven by the highly active GitHub community of millions of developers. You can discuss problems and maybe learn a few unofficial but awesome hacks there. On the other hand, GitLab undertook some great activities, such as hosting community events and connecting open source contributors.

If you’re looking for the biggest community of developers, chances are high that GitHub is the better place to be.

GitLab Enterprise vs GitHub Enterprise

On an enterprise level, you should consider further factors when making an informed decision of whether to use GitLab vs GitHub.

GitHub is highly popular among developers, and over the last few years, it gained popularity among larger development teams and organizations too.

On the other hand, GitLab is pretty strong on enterprise features, too. With different enterprise plans available, GitLab is particularly popular among larger development teams.

Here is, how GitLab and GitHub compare on pricing.

While GitHub’s enterprise plan starts at 2,500 USD per 10 users per year (= 250 USD per user), GitLab’s enterprise starter plan is 39 USD per user/per year.

Wrapping it up.

Undoubtedly, GitHub is still the most popular git repository with the largest number of users and projects. However, GitLab is doing a fantastic job offering your entire development (and DevOps) teams great tools for more efficient workflows.

Bonus tip: Get user feedback & bug reports with Usersnap

And the best part? You can connect GitHub issues or GitLab issues with Usersnap to get visual bug reports directly sent to your preferred system.

Get great user feedback & bug reports with a free Usersnap trial.


Cập nhật thông tin chi tiết về Shipping Vs. Delivery: What’s The Difference? trên website Channuoithuy.edu.vn. Hy vọng nội dung bài viết sẽ đáp ứng được nhu cầu của bạn, chúng tôi sẽ thường xuyên cập nhật mới nội dung để bạn nhận được thông tin nhanh chóng và chính xác nhất. Chúc bạn một ngày tốt lành!